This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.08.004. This is version 4 of this Preprint.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.08.004. This is version 4 of this Preprint.
All aspects of biodiversity research, from taxonomy to conservation, rely on data associated with species names. Effective integration of names across multiple fields is paramount and depends on coordination and organization of taxonomic data. We assess current efforts and find that even key applications for well-studied taxa still lack commonality in taxonomic information required for integration. We identify essential taxonomic elements from our interoperability assessment to support improved access and integration of taxonomic data. A stronger focus on these elements has the potential to involve taxonomic communities in biodiversity science and overcome broken linkages currently limiting research capacity. We encourage a community effort to democratize taxonomic expertise and language in order to facilitate maximum interoperability and integration.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2WC74
Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences
taxonomic backbone, integrative science, data linkage, social infrastructure, biodiversity conservation
Published: 2022-10-28 13:03
Last Updated: 2023-09-07 08:59
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Conflict of interest statement:
None.
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Open data/code are not available, but will be available upon publication of the manuscript.
Language:
English
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.