Implementing Code Review in the Scientific Workflow: Insights from Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: This is version 7 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.


Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Edward Richard Ivimey-Cook, Joel L Pick, Kevin Bairos-Novak, Antica Culina, Elliot Gould , Matthew Grainger, Benjamin Marshall, David Moreau, Matthieu Paquet , Raphaël Royauté, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Inês Silva , Saras Windecker


Code review increases reliability and improves reproducibility of research. As such, code review is an inevitable step in software development and is common in fields such as computer science. However, despite its importance, code review is noticeably lacking in ecology and evolutionary biology. This is problematic as it facilitates the propagation of coding errors and a reduction in reproducibility and reliability of published results. To address this, we provide a detailed commentary on how to effectively review code, how to set up your project to enable this form of review and detail its possible implementation at several stages throughout the research process. This guide serves as a primer for code review, and adoption of the principles and advice here will go a long way in promoting more open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology.



Life Sciences


reliability, reproducibility, software development, coding errors, research process, open science, transparency, reproducibility, software development, coding errors, research process, open science, transparency


Published: 2023-05-16 18:08

Last Updated: 2023-10-11 23:41

Older Versions

CC-BY Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata


Conflict of interest statement:

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable