Beta diversity of restored river dike grasslands is strongly influenced by uncontrolled spatio-temporal variability

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Markus Bauer , Jakob Huber, Johannes Kollmann

Abstract

1. Spatio-temporal dynamics of biodiversity are a key measure when monitoring restoration success. Balanced species turnover is aimed at because it increases overall biodiversity and improves ecosystem stability and multifunctionality. For predictive restoration, it is important to analyse spatial beta diversity and to identify its drivers like site characteristics but also uncontrolled factors like spatial effects, historical factors, year effects and non-directional temporal turnover.
2. We studied dike grasslands 4–19 years after restoration at River Danube in SE Germany over five years (2017–2021, 41 plots in 12 sites). We calculated beta diversity indices to describe spatial variation and temporal turnover, including their additive components ‘replacement’ and ‘nestedness’, or ‘gains’ and ‘losses’.
3. The analysis of the spatial variation of the restored dike grasslands did not reveal homogenisation despite a significant temporal turnover, and was largely dominated by replacement-driven dissimilarity. The replacement drivers changed over time, although replacement was mainly affected by exposition and spatial factors. Historical factors were inconsistent over time, and no statistically clear drivers were found for nestedness.
4. The dike grasslands exhibited on average 37 ± 11% (mean ± SD) year-to-year turnover in species composition, with some spatio-temporal variation. Gains and losses were balanced over time, although prevalences changed over time and were most pronounced on south-exposed slopes.
5. The restored grasslands exhibited spatial variation by site characteristics but also uncontrolled spatial factors. Moreover, high non-directional temporal turnover caused by weather fluctuations, slightly varying management, and stochastic biotic dynamics influenced spatial variation. Thus, restoration targets should be defined as a desired variation of alternative states. Furthermore, the dominance of replacement should move the focus from searching the perfect fit for certain targets to a variation of the approaches to increase beta diversity.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2959J

Subjects

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Keywords

community assembly, Embankment, Replacement, spatial heterogeneity, Species composition, temporal variability, Year effects

Dates

Published: 2023-01-20 08:39

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7551403

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.