Skip to main content
Flower constancy in pollinators: a bouquet of agendas shapes interactions among mutualistic partners

Flower constancy in pollinators: a bouquet of agendas shapes interactions among mutualistic partners

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Christoph Grüter

Abstract

Plant-pollinator interactions have become a major research area due to their impact on key ecosystem services. One pollinator behaviour of particular importance is flower constancy, i.e. the tendency of pollinators to temporarily specialise on one flower species during a foraging trip, thereby promoting cross-pollination. The costs and benefits of flower constancy for both plants and pollinators are varied, complex and far from understood. This review aims to synthesise and interpret studies spanning the last decades, from both plant and pollinator perspectives. Flower constancy is often viewed as an epiphenomenon of pollinator cognition, but there is increasing recognition that pollinators show remarkable behavioural flexibility in their flower choice, often in response to ecological and social factors. Plants usually benefit from flower constancy, which reduces pollen loss and interspecific pollen transfer. However, in some situations, pollinator inconstancy can be advantageous due to increased visits from pollinators shared with co-flowering plants. The fitness consequences of pollinator behaviour for rare or invasive plants are intriguing yet little understood, with important implications plant conservation. Rather than seeing flower constancy as a strategy imposed on pollinators by cognitive constraints, this review emphasises that plants and pollinators pursue varied agendas depending on their ecological context and lifestyle.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X28D3C

Subjects

Life Sciences

Keywords

Dates

Published: 2025-08-15 07:32

Last Updated: 2025-08-20 09:42

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable

Language:
English