This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Forest Carbon Diligence: Digital MRV for Jurisdictional and Voluntary Offsets Markets
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Forest Carbon Diligence is a digital MRV system for mapping forest structure and forest carbon over time. This manuscript describes the qualities of the Diligence datasets — annual maps of canopy cover, canopy height, aboveground carbon density, change detection, and their uncertainties — and quantifies performance across multiple MRV contexts.
Canopy height and canopy cover regression metrics were high (height r2=0.83, cover r2=0.79 over NEON), as were aboveground carbon metrics (GEDI L4A r2=0.64 at 30 m, GEDI L4B r2=0.82 at 1 km). Carbon intercomparisons found strong agreement among 8 independent datasets. Agreement was highest with GEDI, showing strong correlations at multiple scales (r=0.92 for 1 km comparisons, and r=0.98 for 1 degree, ecoregion, and national scales). Diligence and CCI were correlated in mid-latitude (r=0.8) and high-latitude ecoregions (r=0.88). Country-level agreement with FAO data was high (r=0.76), as was agreement with field- and project-based carbon estimates from FIA (r=0.86) and CARB (r=0.76). Correlations were lower in pixel-level comparisons at NEON field plots (r=0.58) and in Central Africa (r=0.71), identifying a negative bias in carbon-dense forests.
These results demonstrate how Forest Carbon Diligence can support policy and market needs by providing scientific, well-calibrated, and consistent estimates of aboveground forest carbon stocks.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2KW7H
Subjects
Environmental Monitoring, Forest Sciences, Technology and Innovation
Keywords
Earth Observations, Jurisdictional Carbon Markets, forest carbon
Dates
Published: 2025-08-11 15:49
Last Updated: 2025-08-11 15:49
License
CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
Forest Carbon Diligence is a commercially available product provided by Planet Labs PBC. The authors are current or former employees, as well as shareholders, of Planet Labs PBC. Joseph Mascaro is presently a contributor to the GEDI Competed Science Team, and Tara O’Shea is presently a contributor at the Woods Institute for the Environment; their primary contributions to this work occurred during their times at Planet Labs PBC.
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Open data/code are not available
Language:
English
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.