This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

The number of strong social bonds is linked to survival in a cooperative bird
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Recent evidence from large mammals, including humans, shows that the quality of social associations beyond general group size can positively influence health and survival. However, whether individuals in other taxa consistently differ in sociality in ways that affect fitness and thus provide a basis for selection remains largely unexplored. In this study, we examined how individual sociality relates to survival probabilities in a population of sociable weavers (Philetairus socius), a highly cooperative bird. We combined social network analysis with multi-state capture–recapture models to quantify the number of strong social bonds each individual had and to estimate survival probabilities. We found that sociality was positively associated with survival: individuals with medium and high sociality showed higher survival probabilities than those with low sociality. Additionally, individuals were more likely to remain in the same sociality category across years than to shift to another, and when transitions occurred, they followed a gradual pattern, with adjacent shifts more common than abrupt changes, supporting the idea of stable individual differences in sociality. These findings support a link between sociality and individual fitness, and suggest that stable social traits may provide a basis for evolutionary change.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2H63G
Subjects
Life Sciences
Keywords
social bonds, survival, fitness trade-offs, multi-state capture-recapture, sociality, social network
Dates
Published: 2025-07-24 17:56
Last Updated: 2025-07-24 17:56
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Data (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16276322) and codes are available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16276060).
Language:
English
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.