Skip to main content
Nature restoration legislation means redefining targets and forecasting progress

Nature restoration legislation means redefining targets and forecasting progress

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

David Y. Shen, Signe Normand

Abstract

Nature restoration is at a pivotal moment, driven by global initiatives like the EU Nature Restoration Law and the Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework. These frameworks pose key challenges to how restoration targets are defined to ensure they are not only achievable and measurable but also resilient to future environmental changes. This requires addressing two key challenges: setting forward-looking restoration targets that account for dynamic environmental changes and developing methods to predict and forecast progress. We propose that restoration should focus on restoring ecosystem functions that represent the natural state based on current conditions, ecological history, and are resilient to future environmental change. Secondly, restoration efforts must be predictive, and we propose a two-stage process to predict outcomes prior to an intervention, and forecast progress over time. We argue that only by integrating these approaches, can restoration policies lead to large scale restoration for ecological recovery and long-term societal benefits.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X25353

Subjects

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Keywords

Nature restoration, restoration outcomes, biodiversity targets, temporal prediction, restoration legislation

Dates

Published: 2025-07-07 21:33

Last Updated: 2025-07-07 21:33

License

No Creative Commons license

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
N/A

Language:
English