This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Still, the environment selects: disentangling the Effect of Distance Decay on Soil Bacterial Communities
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Soil bacterial communities are central to ecosystem functioning, yet the relative importance of dispersal limitation, environmental selection, and biotic interactions in shaping their spatial turnover remains unresolved. Distance–decay relationships (DDRs)—the decline in community similarity with geographic distance—are commonly observed for microbial communities, but their underlying drivers across ecologically relevant spatial scales remain unclear. We analyzed soil bacterial communities in temperate grasslands across two regions in Germany to quantify the contribution of geographic distance, soil physicochemical properties, plant community composition, and plant traits to bacterial β-diversity. Generalized linear modeling, variation partitioning, and commonality analysis revealed a clear DDR, with bacterial similarity declining by ~5% for each doubling of geographic distance. However, soil physicochemical heterogeneity accounted for over 50% of the explained variation in the bacterial DDR and nearly 30% of the total variation in community composition. Plant community composition independently explained additional variation, while plant functional traits had only marginal effects. Notably, fine-scale environmental heterogeneity within sites contributed to high turnover over short distances, indicating strong abiotic filtering even at the plot scale. Then, to further assess microbial distribution patterns, we examined the relationship between taxon abundance and spatial range. We found that rare taxa were both locally and broadly distributed, suggesting that rarity does not necessarily constrain dispersal. Dominant taxa, particularly from Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, were consistently broadly distributed, in accordance with generalist lifestyles. In contrast, we found a small, but taxonomically diverse group of highly abundant taxa which were distributed only over intermediate ranges, suggesting that dispersal limitation does not constrain dominance. Our results demonstrate that soil bacterial DDRs emerge primarily from environmental filtering and plant–soil interactions, with a secondary role for spatial separation. These findings highlight the importance of integrating spatially explicit sampling with soil and vegetation data in microbial biogeography, and shed light on the complex patterns of dispersal limitation in microbial communities.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2DM0J
Subjects
Environmental Microbiology and Microbial Ecology Life Sciences
Keywords
soil microbiota, metabarcoding, spatial ecology
Dates
Published: 2025-07-06 22:11
Last Updated: 2025-07-06 22:11
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Language:
English
Data and Code Availability Statement:
R code for all analyses is available in GitHub (https://github.com/NeisseN/BEO_DDR).Raw sequences are publicly available in NCBI’s Sequence Read Archives under accession number PRJNA1284051, and processed data and corresponding metadata are available in BExIS (accession numbers 32155 and 332156, respectively; Neisse, 2025).
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.