Skip to main content
Revisiting the copepod diversity of Indian Sundarbans through estimation of carcasses

Revisiting the copepod diversity of Indian Sundarbans through estimation of carcasses

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Debarati Sengupta, Danilo Calliari, Sourav Paul

Abstract

Diversity assessment of plankton traditionally considers species richness and abundance, overlooking the vital state of individuals (i.e., alive or dead). This study aimed to integrate the vital state of zooplankters into diversity indices, using the copepods of the Indian Sundarbans (IS) as an example community. It was hypothesized that when carcasses estimation (CE) is incorporated diversity estimates deviate from those derived from the traditional diversity assessment (TDA) method. Seasonal sampling was conducted between 2022 and 2024 from seven sampling stations of the IS. The monsoon had the highest variability in temperature, salinity and pH, followed by the pre- and post-monsoon periods, and the overall highest abundance of copepod carcasses (51%), followed by the post-monsoon (18%) and pre-monsoon (11%).Variations were also noted in the relative abundances of species calculated through the TDA and CE methods, which even affected the dominance hierarchy of the community, in particularly during the monsoon. Species richness deviated more than the Shannon index, which deviated more than the Simpson and Pielou’s indices when the TDA and CE methods were compared. The maximum deviations of diversity indices were observed in the monsoon compared to pre- and post-monsoon. The CE corrected method for copepod diversity estimation indicates the need to revisit zooplankton diversity estimates, especially for volatile environments like estuaries, coastal areas. Current results together with novel approaches to characterize biological diversity (e.g., environmental DNA) suggest the need to discriminate ‘living diversity’ and ‘holistic diversity’ for a better understanding of the structure and functions of plankton, including microscopic life.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2G05V

Subjects

Life Sciences

Keywords

plankton, Vital status, Diversity indices, Seasonal change, Estuary, Vital status, Diversity indices, Seasonal Change, Estuary

Dates

Published: 2025-05-21 15:54

Last Updated: 2025-05-21 15:54

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
All authors declare that they have no competing interest on connection with this study

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Data would be provided with a reasonable request for non-commercial purpose. 

Language:
English