Skip to main content
Dragon Kill Points: applying a transparent working template to relieve authorship stress

Dragon Kill Points: applying a transparent working template to relieve authorship stress

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

April Robin Martinig , Spenser L. P. Burk, Szymon Marian Drobniak , Isabella Perry, Kyle Morrison , Megan Petersohn, Shinichi Nakagawa , Pietro Pollo, Lorenzo Ricolfi , Coralie Williams , Aimee Chhen, Ayumi Mizuno , Jess Tam, Yefeng Yang, Julia de Jong, Alberto Ceccacci, Sandra Cuadros, Malgorzata Lagisz 

Abstract

The concept of authorship, while straightforward in theory, proves to be remarkably complex in practice. While existing frameworks provide a foundation for classifying and ranking authorship roles, conflicts still arise when contributions are ambiguous or poorly documented. To address these issues, we propose Dragon Kill Points, adapted from multiplayer gaming, which tracks individual contributions to projects throughout their lifecycle. Dragon Kill Points is built around five key principles: granularity, responsibility, equity, autonomy, and transparency (GREAT). Granularity ensures detailed documentation of tasks, preventing underrepresentation of individual contributions. Responsibility is maintained by setting clear authorship criteria from the outset, allowing contributors to know how their work will be recognised. Equity ensures authorship rules apply to every team member, flattening hierarchies and highlighting ghost or gift authorship. Autonomy allows contributors to challenge or change their authorship position based on their contributions as the project progresses. Finally, transparency fosters trust by continuously sharing contribution records with the entire team. Through Dragon Kill Points, researchers can reduce conflicts, create more inclusive authorship practices, and acknowledge the true value of middle authorship positions. This system offers a flexible, scalable approach to managing authorship across various contexts, providing a solution to the complex challenges of collaboration.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2W05K

Subjects

Arts and Humanities, Business, Education, Engineering, Law, Life Sciences, Medicine and Health Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

accountability, coauthorship, collaborative, credit, publishing, contributorship

Dates

Published: 2025-03-20 17:00

Last Updated: 2025-03-20 17:00

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
https://github.com/martinig/dragon-kill-points

Language:
English