Breaking Barriers: Dualistic Thinking in Religious and Social Contexts and its Environmental Impact

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Chloë Vercauteren

Abstract

Breaking Barriers: Dualistic Thinking in Religious and Social Contexts and its environmental impact explores the intricate relationship between dualistic thinking, influenced by religious and societal norms, and its role in perpetuating environmental degradation. Through an interdisciplinary analysis spanning history and philosophy, it investigates how entrenched dualistic frameworks, such as Cartesian dualism, reinforces hierarchical divisions between humanity and nature. Moreover, by examining historical examples, the paper uncovers the ways in which patriarchal ideologies intersect with other forms of discrimination, like environmental oppression. Additionally, it delves into the ethical implications of dualistic thinking, advocating for a holistic understanding that transcends binary distinctions for sustainable solutions. The research question guides the exploration of how dismantling dualistic perspectives and embracing relational ethics can foster a deeper connection to nature and improve ethical responses to environmental crises. Ultimately, the paper aims to contribute to a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between human beliefs, societal structures, and environmental ethics, offering insights into pathways towards a more sustainable and harmonious coexistence with the natural world.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2305F

Subjects

Arts and Humanities, Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

Dualistic thinking, Environmental exploitation, Relational ethics, Patriarchal ideologies, sustainability, Environmental exploitation, Relational ethics, Patriarchal ideologies, sustainability

Dates

Published: 2025-02-21 09:37

Last Updated: 2025-02-21 13:23

Older Versions
License

No Creative Commons license

Additional Metadata

Language:
English

Conflict of interest statement:
None