This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Selecting biodiversity indicators to report national and subnational progress towards the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) is a major challenge, one made even more urgent by the fast approaching 2030 targets. To efficiently identify appropriate indicators, the selection process must be streamlined, while remaining transparent, effective, and with the active engagement of stakeholders from the academic, public, and private sectors. We present guidelines for the selection of biodiversity indicators to track progress towards 2030 targets in the context of the GBF, with a case study of the province-level indicator recommendation process for Quebec’s 2030 Nature Plan. We outline six steps to develop a shortlist of indicators that are relevant to targets, fulfill minimum criteria of scientific quality given the province’s available biodiversity data, and practical to inform decisions and on-the-ground conservation actions. We present the rationale and outcomes of this selection process, culminating in the 15 biodiversity indicators that we recommended for Quebec’s 2030 Nature Plan. Going forward, we recommend continuing to build trust across sectors, developing communication guidelines to standardize indicator reporting, and testing indicator performance at national and subnational scales. Overall, this case study demonstrates that with active engagement and cooperation, we can rapidly rise to the challenge of identifying the indicators we need to track and report biodiversity change.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2JK8G
Subjects
Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
Indicators, Global Biodiversity Framework, Monitoring, indicator selection, conservation, decision-support, Global Biodiversity Framework, Nature Plan 2030, Québec, monitoring, indicator selection, biodiversity, conservation, decision-support
Dates
Published: 2024-12-19 07:11
Last Updated: 2024-12-19 15:11
License
CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Language:
English
Conflict of interest statement:
None.
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.