This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Why we age is an enduring mystery. This manuscript proposes aging is microevolutionarily opposed, but macroevolutionarily favored. Such a conflict between microevolution and macroevolution is highly unusual since traits that are harmful to the organism are usually harmful to the survival of the species. In the case of aging, however, a shorter lifespan makes a species better able to adapt to a changing environment. Conversely, species that age more slowly, and thus live longer, are less adaptable and more likely to go extinct. Drawing on what is known of aging in vertebrates, pathways of aging are identified that agree with this theory. These pathways involve mitochondrial ROS production causing telomeric DNA damage, which leads to cellular senescence, the senescence-associated secretory phenotype, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, thymic involution, and age-related diseases. The resulting framework is capable of explaining the seeming intentionality of many age-related diseases, and offers a high level theoretical framework for better understanding them.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2D625
Subjects
Biology, Evolution
Keywords
Microevolution, Macroevolution, aging, programmed aging, evolvability, age-related diseases
Dates
Published: 2024-11-20 22:24
License
CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Language:
English
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.