Border biosecurity interceptions for air passengers – assessing intervention methods and analytic tools

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Nicholas Patrick Moran , Anca M Hanea, Andrew P Robinson

Abstract

At-border interventions are a critical step along the biosecurity continuum, to measure and control the risks associated with the cross-border movement of people and goods. Air passengers are a high-volume pathway for a range of biosecurity risk materials, against which various interventions may be used (e.g., manual searches, detector dogs, x-rays, etc.). Using a large interception database for air passengers entering the southern Australian state of Tasmania, this study applies common statistical modelling tools to assess the efficacy of interventions (namely, dog detectors, and bag searches), and to identify pathway risk factors (e.g., flight origin/route). Tasmania is an island state, and its environment and industries have benefited from a low level of invasive pests due to their geographic isolation. Therefore, relatively strict at-border interventions are used to prevent the entry of new pests, including some serious invasive pests already present on mainland Australia (e.g., Queensland and Mediterranean fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, Ceratitis capitata). This analysis considered the effects of interventions on both voluntary declarations by passengers and also detections of undeclared risk material on passengers. The analysis also focused on biosecurity risk items generally (e.g., fruits and vegetables, meat products, cut flowers), and items that are specifically considered to be fruit-fly hosts. The results highlight the strong positive effects of detector dogs on the rate of interceptions, particularly of items detected on passengers. Conducting bag searches also appears to increase interceptions, both by increasing the rate of items being detected and by encouraging voluntary declarations. Sensitivity analyses then test the robustness of results to modelling implementation methods and distributional assumptions. This study demonstrates how statistical modelling can provide robust insights into biosecurity interventions and risk factors along pathways, and further highlights the value of high-quality interception data resources for informing and improving biosecurity systems.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2JW42

Subjects

Agriculture, Biosecurity, Life Sciences

Keywords

Ceratitis capitata, Ceratitis capitata, Bactrocera tryoni, fruit fly, invasive species, passenger screening, pathway risk analysis, sniffer dogs, detector dogs, border biosecurity, Bactrocera tryoni, fruit fly, Invasive species, passenger screening, pathway risk analysis, sniffer dogs, detector dogs

Dates

Published: 2024-11-14 18:21

Last Updated: 2024-11-14 23:21

License

CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Language:
English

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
https://osf.io/78tv9/