Language, economic, and gender disparities widen the scientific productivity gap

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Tatsuya Amano, Valeria Ramírez-Castañeda , Violeta Berdejo-Espinola, Israel Borokini, Shawan Chowdhury , Marina Golivets, Juan David González-Trujillo, Flavia Montaño-Centellas, Kumar Paudel, Rachel Louise White, Diogo Veríssimo

Abstract

Scientific communities need to understand and eliminate barriers that prevent scientists from reaching their full potential. However, the combined impact of individuals’ linguistic, economic, and gender backgrounds on their scientific productivity is poorly understood. Using a survey of 908 environmental scientists, we show that being a woman is associated with up to a 45% reduction in the number of English-language publications, compared to men. Being a non-native English speaker from a low-income country is associated with a further 25% reduction. The linguistic and economic productivity gap narrows when based on the total number of English- and non-English-language publications. We call for an explicit effort to consider linguistic, economic, and gender backgrounds and incorporate non-English-language publications when assessing the performance and contribution of scientists.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2F914

Subjects

Environmental Studies

Keywords

Equity, inequality, Diversity, Inclusion, language barriers, economic barriers, gender indentity, under-represented group, scientific productivity

Dates

Published: 2024-11-01 02:07

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Language:
English

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
We are unable to make data on participants’ responses to the survey questions publicly available, as per our agreement with the University of Queensland Ethics office (committee: Science Low and Negligible Risk Committee, approval number: 2021/HE000566) and due to the confidentiality of the data. All codes used in the analysis are available at: https://osf.io/w6cu3.