Overcoming Key Challenges of Satellite-based Monitoring of Ecosystem Condition: A Continental-scale Example From Australia

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Kristen Jennifer Williams, Simon Ferrier, Eric A Lehmann, Thomas D Harwood, Randall J Donohue, Kathryn M Giljohann, Roozbeh Valavi, Ning Liu, Chris Ware, Peter Lyon, Thomas G Van Niel, Tim R McVicar, Anna Richards, Cassandra Malley

Abstract

Effective satellite-based monitoring of ecosystem integrity or condition needs to address four key challenges: (a) context dependency; (b) alternative ecological states; (c) short-term temporal ecosystem dynamics; and (d) scarcity of reference data where ecosystems retain high levels of integrity. Here we present a typology, and outline strengths and weaknesses, of different approaches to mapping and monitoring ecosystem integrity across entire regions or continents using time series satellite data. We then describe how one of these approaches, the Habitat Condition Assessment System (HCAS), addresses all of the above challenges, and provide an outline of the evolved method which includes annual outputs, and Australian continent applications. HCAS requires three readily available inputs (i.e., representative examples of relatively natural areas as reference sites, remotely sensed ecosystem characteristics, and environmental covariate data) and could be easily adapted and applied by other countries to provide an effective indicator of ecosystem integrity for nature-based decisions.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2333Q

Subjects

Life Sciences

Keywords

Ecosystem Integrity, remote sensing, Change Detection, ecosystem accounting, biodiversity persistence

Dates

Published: 2024-10-30 07:57

Last Updated: 2024-10-30 21:39

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Language:
English

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
HCAS version 2.3 data collection: https://doi.org/10.25919/arew-q819 (HCAS v2.3 code not available)