This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Restoring biological diversity and ecosystem function requires understanding how introduced species interact with one another and their environments. The most prevalent and challenging scenarios involve multiple invasive species whose traits feedback through ecosystem processes. However, research into these systems often focuses on either community dynamics or ecosystem properties, rather than their interactions, limiting understanding of what causes biodiversity changes before and after restoration. Leveraging insights from theory and management of single-species invasions driven by feedback between plant litter and germination success, we documented the structure of a disturbed mangrove ecosystem and tested causal hypotheses for community and ecosystem change both in microcosms and across the landscape. Before restoration, competing invasive trees generated litter that facilitated the dominance of a single recently introduced species. After experimental restoration, native species seedling cover and richness increased only when removing invasive trees and their litter, supporting interacting community and ecosystem effects as the primary drivers of biodiversity change. Effective restoration of multiply-invaded ecosystems is possible when simple interventions follow causal hypotheses supported by theoretical mechanisms.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2F03S
Subjects
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
Casuarina, coexistence theory, dredge spoil, ecological succession, regime shift, Schinus terebinthifolia
Dates
Published: 2024-08-28 11:25
License
CC-BY Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Language:
English
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest
Data and Code Availability Statement:
The Standard Operating Procedures, Data and Code supporting the results are available in the private repository that will be published with the reserved DOI upon acceptance of the manuscript.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.