A toolbox to quantify human activity in protected areas for park management

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Alys Granados , Christopher Bierne, Sean Kearney, Catherine Sun, Courtney Hughes, Solène Marion, Annie Loosen, Anne Hubbs, Dan Farr, Mitchell Fennell, Michael Procko, Melanie Percy, John Paczkowski, Keegan Hoffman, Regan Kohlhardt, Jesse Whittington, Benjamin Curry, A. Cole Burton

Abstract

1. Recreation in protected areas (PAs) is growing worldwide, potentially conflicting with wildlife and ecosystem protection. Efficiently estimating human activity in PAs is crucial for balancing a dual mandate of supporting visitor access and biodiversity, but managers lack clear recommendations about how best to monitor spatial and temporal trends in human activity.
2. Through two case studies, we reviewed several key tools for measuring human activity in PAs to assess the impacts on wildlife: camera traps, day passes, trail counters, and social media. We measured human activity across multiple scales and compared spatial and temporal activity estimates within and between PAs.
3. We found strong correlations between tools across PAs and a combination of tools may be better suited to understand finer-scale trends within parks. Individual tools, and their combination, can be tailored to specific research and management goals.
4. Synthesis and applications: Our case studies provide insights into the effectiveness of tools for measuring human activity in PAs and informs practitioners and researchers about how they can be used to address real-world management decisions. Tools varied in their strengths and their weaknesses and looking forward, the widespread adoption of multiple, integrated measures of human activity is needed to develop evidence-based park management strategies, benefitting both humans and nature.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2KP7F

Subjects

Biodiversity

Keywords

camera trap, outdoor recreation, social media, park visitation

Dates

Published: 2024-08-26 04:10

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Language:
English

Conflict of interest statement:
No conflicts to declare