This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102921. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Supplementary Files
Authors
Abstract
Dynamic yet accurate reserve-level species lists are essential for conservation and biodiversity research. Even when such lists exist, changing taxonomy, ongoing species migrations and invasions, and new discoveries of historically overlooked species mean static lists can become rapidly outdated. Biodiversity databases such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, and citizen science platforms such as iNaturalist, offer rapidly accessible, georeferenced data, but their accuracy is rarely tested. Here we compare species lists generated for two of the world’s oldest, more famous natural reserves – Yosemite National Park in California, United States and Royal National Park in New South Wales, Australia – using both automated data extraction techniques and extensive manual curation steps. Here we show that automated list creation without manual curation offers inflated measures of species diversity at a reserve level. Lists generated from herbarium vouchers required far more curation than lists generated from iNaturalist, with both incorrect coordinates attached to vouchers and long-outdated names inflating voucher-based species lists. In comparison, iNaturalist data had relatively few errors, in part due to continual curation by a large community, including many botanical experts, and the frequent and automatic implementation of taxonomic updates. As such, iNaturalist will become an increasingly accurate source of automated biodiversity lists over time, but currently offers poor coverage of graminoid species and introduced species relative to showier, native taxa. At this point, researchers must manually curate lists extracted from herbarium vouchers or static reserve lists, and integrate these data with records from iNaturalist, to produce the most robust and taxonomically up-to-date reserve-level species lists.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2VK6H
Subjects
Life Sciences
Keywords
biodiversity inventory, Curation, iNaturalist, , species list, species list, species occurrence, voucher
Dates
Published: 2024-06-19 21:30
Last Updated: 2024-12-02 08:40
Older Versions
License
CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Language:
English
Data and Code Availability Statement:
https://github.com/tmesaglio/Yosemite_Royal_species_lists
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.