MECHANISTIC MODEL OF VEGETATION STRUCTURE AND ANIMAL COMMUNITY INTERACTIONS-INTEGRATING GEDI & TLS DATA IN THE MADINGLEY MODEL

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Camille Gaillard , Christopher Doughty , Andrew J Abraham, Michael Harfoot, Scott Goetz, Luca Santini, Alexander Shenkin, Toby Jackson, Patrick Jantz, Patrick Burns

Abstract

Background Vegetation structure is increasingly recognized as a key variable to explain ecosystems states and dynamics. New Remote Sensing tools are available to complement labor intensive field investigations and consider the global biogeography of this parameter. Objectives We propose to model the processes explaining the interaction between vegetation structure and animal community assembly globally, while requiring minimal computing power, based on the most fundamentals assumptions. Methods We integrate spaceborne (GEDI: Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation) and ground based (TLS: Terrestrial Laser Scanning) Lidar data in the Madingley general ecosystem model. We compare the outcome of this integration to previous version and to the TetraDensity estimate of animal biomass and Elton traits database for arboreality. Results Animal biomass density simulated by Madingley is closer to global estimates when integrating vegetation structure. The strength of this effect increases with higher cohort body mass and varies with local environmental conditions and stochastic processes. Simulated proportion of arboreality across cohorts is consistently higher than observations. This is consistent with the divergence of biases between model and database. Conclusions Our results concur with our hypotheses about the role of vegetation structure on animal community assembly, as it reduces total animal biomass abundance. However, assessing the accuracy of its relative weight is challenging. While we have global products about arboreality and animal biomass density, they represent modern day ecosystem state, including anthropogenic activity, while Madingley simulates potential ecosystem optimum. Therefore, we call for further research in this field and for challenging modelling attempts to compare with.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2DW56

Subjects

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Population Biology

Keywords

Vegetation Structure, GEDI, TLS, LiDAR, Madingley, Arboreality, Mechanistic modelling

Dates

Published: 2024-05-07 17:52

Last Updated: 2024-05-13 16:48

Older Versions
License

CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Language:
English

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Code is available at: https://github.com/Megabiota-Lab/MadingleyCPP-openMP-3D-V1.1