This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122172. This is version 4 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Mast seeding, a phenomenon observed in numerous perennial plant species, is highly variable reproduction across years, synchronized among individuals within a population. One major fitness advantage of masting lies in the reduction of seed predation rates, achieved through alternating phases of seed scarcity and abundance that starve and subsequently satiate seed consumers. Proximately, the variability in seed production frequently correlates with weather conditions. Convergent responses among species to weather fluctuations often lead to synchronized masting events across species, which may help with predator satiation, but this hypothesis has been rarely tested. In this study, we address this gap by using 23 years of seed production and pre-dispersal seed predation monitoring in three North American oak species (\emph{Quercus rubra}, \emph{Quercus alba}, \emph{Quercus montana}). We found that spring and summer weather patterns correlated with masting events in all three species, resulting in intraspecific synchrony levels ranging from 0.21 to 0.38, depending on the species pair. Intraspecific masting synchrony facilitated efficient insect starvation in \emph{Q. rubra} and \emph{Q. alba}, while community-wide mast years were necessary for satiation in \emph{Q. montana}. Our findings present a rare empirical test supporting the hypothesis that intraspecific masting synchrony enhances reproductive efficiency by minimizing seed losses to generalist seed predators.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2H31P
Subjects
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences
Keywords
Dates
Published: 2024-03-12 18:27
Last Updated: 2024-08-12 20:22
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Language:
English
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
The data supporting the results are available at OSF: https://osf.io/uxfn2/?view_only=a86fd05a9b7041cb9faeb707be1aa94d
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.