This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.3390/e26060506. This is version 3 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Information-theoretic (IT) and multi-model averaging (MMA) statistical approaches are widely used but suboptimal tools for pursuing a multifactorial approach (also known as the method of multiple working hypotheses) in ecology. (1) Conceptually, IT encourages ecologists to perform tests on sets of artificial models. (2) MMA improves on IT model selection by implementing a simple form of *shrinkage estimation* (a way to make accurate predictions from a model with many parameters, by "shrinking" parameter estimates toward zero). However, other shrinkage estimators such as penalized regression or Bayesian hierarchical models with regularizing priors are more computationally efficient and better supported theoretically. (3) In general the procedures for extracting confidence intervals from MMA are overconfident, giving overly narrow intervals. If researchers want to accurately estimate the strength of multiple competing ecological processes along with reliable confidence intervals, the current best approach is to use full (maximal) statistical models (possibly with Bayesian priors) after making principled, a priori decisions about which predictors to include.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2Z01P
Subjects
Applied Statistics, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
multi-model averaging, model selection, coverage, AIC, inference, shrinkage
Dates
Published: 2023-07-23 07:14
Last Updated: 2024-02-29 22:41
Older Versions
License
CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Language:
English
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.