This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16379. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Supplementary Files
Authors
Abstract
Collisions between birds and aircraft cause bird mortality, economic damage, and aviation safety hazards. One proposed solution to increasing the distance at which birds detect and move away from an approaching aircraft, ultimately mitigating the probability of collision, is through onboard lighting systems. Lights in vehicles have been shown to lead to earlier reactions in some bird species but they could also generate attraction, potentially increasing the probability of collision. Using information on the visual system of the Canada goose (Branta canadensis), we developed light stimuli of high chromatic contrast to their eyes. We then conducted a controlled behavioral experiment (i.e., single-choice test) to assess the avoidance or attraction responses of Canada geese to LED lights of different wavelengths (blue, 483 nm; red, 631nm) and pulsing frequencies (steady, pulsing at 2 Hz). Overall, Canada geese tended to avoid the blue light and move towards the red light treatment; however, these responses depended heavily on light exposure order. At the beginning of the experiment, geese tended to avoid the red light. However, after further exposure the birds developed an attraction to the red light, consistent with the mere exposure effect. The response to the blue light generally followed a U-shape relationship (avoidance, attraction, avoidance) with increasing number of exposures, again consistent with the mere exposure effect, but followed by the satiation effect. Lights pulsing at 2 Hz enhanced avoidance responses under high ambient light conditions, whereas steady lights enhanced avoidance responses under dim, ambient light conditions. Our results have implications for the design of lighting systems aimed at mitigating collisions between birds and human objects. LED lights in the blue portion of the spectrum are good candidates for deterrents and lights in the red portion of the spectrum may be counterproductive given the attraction effects with increasing exposure, and consideration should be given to systems that automatically modify pulsing of the light depending on ambient light intensity to enhance avoidance.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X23029
Subjects
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Keywords
Animal-aircraft collisions, animal-vehicle collisions, Visual modeling, Avoidance Behavior, Choice test, LED lights, Avian Deterrent, Light Deterrent
Dates
Published: 2023-05-25 14:23
Last Updated: 2023-05-25 18:23
License
Additional Metadata
Language:
English
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Data and Code Availability Statement:
The data and code for this study can be found at https://osf.io/g9am5/?view_only=a5c667733e044a8090a724cce413b30b and https://github.com/ryanlunn/CanadaGooseLightAvoidance.git
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.