Uncovering the hidden niche: incorporating microclimate temperature into species distribution models

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14312. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Stef Haesen , Jonathan Lenoir , Eva Gril, Pieter De Frenne, Jonas J Lembrechts , Martin Kopecký, Martin Macek, Matěj Man, Jan Wild, Koenraad Van Meerbeek

Abstract

Species’ environmental niches are conventionally modelled using coarse-grained macroclimate data. These data are known to deviate substantially from local, near-ground and proximal conditions (i.e., the microclimate), especially so below forests canopies. Here we aimed to assess the impact of using gridded microclimate data instead of gridded macroclimate data on the performance of species distribution models (SDMs), as well as on the predicted geographical distribution and the derived species response curves of 140 forest specialist plant species across Europe over the 2000-2020 period. We performed a comparative study between SDMs constructed with different sets of bioclimatic predictors to separately test the effect of using (i) proximal climate data instead of conventional macroclimatic data and (ii) high-resolution proximal climate data rather than coarse-gridded macroclimatic data. Therefore, we challenged SDMs with: (1) a macroclimatic dataset at a spatial resolution of 1 km × 1 km; (2) an aggregated microclimatic dataset matching the same resolution of 1 km × 1 km; and (3) a microclimatic dataset at a much finer spatial resolution of 25 m × 25 m. We found significant differences in model performance, indicating that microclimate-based SDMs outperform both their macroclimatic and aggregated counterparts. Most importantly, this study makes clear that macroclimate-based SDMs tend to introduce a systematic bias into the perceived species response curves. Additionally, macroclimatic data is unable to identify warm and cold refugia beyond the range edges of species’ distributions. We thus conclude that microclimate-based SDMs are a crucial tool to gain peculiar insights regarding biodiversity conservation, which is needed to align management actions and prioritize conservation efforts.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X21600

Subjects

Life Sciences

Keywords

climate change, species distribution modelling, MaxEnt, Microclimate, ForestClim, forest plant species, species response curves, understory temperatures

Dates

Published: 2023-05-11 15:16

Last Updated: 2023-12-11 15:16

Older Versions
License

CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Language:
English

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data and Code Availability Statement:
The raw biodiversity data is available through https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.kf533a. ForestClim is freely-available through https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22059125.