orchaRd 2.0: An R package for visualizing meta-analyses with orchard plots

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14152. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Shinichi Nakagawa, Malgorzata Lagisz, Rose E O'Dea, Patrice Pottier , Joanna Rutkowska, Alistair M Senior, Yefeng Yang, Daniel W.A. Noble

Abstract

1. Although meta-analysis has become an essential tool in ecology and evolution, reporting of meta-analytic results can still be much improved. To aid this, we have introduced the orchard plot, which presents not only overall estimates and their confidence intervals but also shows corresponding heterogeneity (as prediction intervals) and individual effect sizes.
2. Here, we have added significant enhancements by integrating many new functionalities as orchaRd 2.0. This updated version allows the visualisation of heteroscedasticity (different variances across levels of a categorical moderator), marginal estimates (e.g., marginalising out effects other than the one visualized), conditional estimates (i.e., estimates of different groups conditioned upon specific values of a continuous variable), and visualizations of all types of interactions between two categorical/continuous moderators.
3. orchaRd 2.0 has additional functions which calculate key statistics from multilevel meta-analytic models such as I2 and R2. Importantly, orchaRd 2.0 contributes to better reporting by complying with PRISMA-EcoEvo (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolution). Taken together, orchaRd 2.0 can improve the presentation of meta-analytic results and facilitate the exploration of previously neglected patterns.
4. In addition, as a part of a literature survey, we found that graphical packages are rarely cited (~3%). We plea that researchers credit developers and maintainers of graphical packages, e.g., by citations in a figure legend, acknowledging the use of relevant packages.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2QC7K

Subjects

Life Sciences

Keywords

caterpillar plot, evidence synthesis, graphical tools, credible interval, credibility interval, summary forest plot, meta-regression, graphical tools, credible interval, credibility interval, summary forest plot, meta-regression

Dates

Published: 2023-01-08 04:03

Last Updated: 2023-05-24 10:21

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
NA

Data and Code Availability Statement:
https://daniel1noble.github.io/orchaRd/