This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
The global target to protect 30% of Earth’s land and ocean by 2030 has prompted governments to report their progress in biodiversity conservation. Announcements of countries reaching 30 % of conservation area are widely commended by the international community, despite signs of increasing pressures within protected areas, poor representativity of key threatened ecosystems, and a lack of indicators to monitor the impact of conservation areas on people. Using Colombia’s experience, we urge megadiverse countries to report indicators of how conservation actions at local scales impact global outcomes, how other effective area-based conservation measures (OEMCs) enhance the impacts of the existing protected area network, and how conservation areas promote an equitable and efficient distribution of benefits to people.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2Z59F
Subjects
Life Sciences
Keywords
area-based conservation measures, Protected areas, species diversity, ecosystem integrity, and connectivity, essential biodiversity variables (EBVs), Species Protection Index (SPI), Species Habitat Index (SHI), socio-ecological indicators
Dates
Published: 2022-11-08 14:08
Last Updated: 2022-11-08 22:08
License
CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.