Small is big: A new conservation paradigm for amphibians

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Emma Cathleen Steigerwald, Julianne Oshiro, Julia Chen, Vance Vredenburg, Alessandro Catenazzi, Michelle Koo

Abstract

Many countries have responded to the current global biodiversity crisis by committing to protect 30% of the Earth by 2030, a goal known as “30 x 30”. However, an excessive emphasis on megafauna to the exclusion of other species weakens our current protected area (PA) network. This limited perspective overvalues large, connected PAs, while disregarding the potential impacts of small PAs in preserving biodiversity. Using public databases of 31,828 terrestrial vertebrate species we demonstrate that range sizes for the most vulnerable class of vertebrates, the amphibians, are smaller than those of reptiles, birds, and mammals and suggest that small PAs are overlooked as conservation tools for this group. We found that, though each of many endangered amphibians could have their entire distribution protected by a single microreserve (< 10 km2), the current PA network fails at adequately protecting most threatened amphibian species. Furthermore, we show that many current microreserves have amphibian species richnesses rivaling those of the largest PAs (10,000–100,00 km2), and that PA networks accumulate new amphibian species more rapidly through the addition of smaller rather than larger PAs. Unfortunately, the global rate of new PA establishment has slowed since 2010, so we illustrate global regions where the addition of microreserves could be most beneficial to amphibian conservation. We conclude that incorporating the needs of overlooked taxa into PA design will require us to complement networks of large, connected PAs with many strategically-placed, biodiversity-motivated microreserves.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2059R

Subjects

Biodiversity, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Keywords

gap analysis, Protected areas, 30x30, World Database of Protected Areas (WDPA)

Dates

Published: 2022-11-02 12:18

Last Updated: 2022-11-06 00:42

Older Versions
License

CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None