This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12672. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Open access is often contentious in the scientific community, but its implications for conservation are under-discussed or omitted entirely from scientific discourse. Access to literature is a key factor impeding implementation of conservation research, and many open access models and concepts that are little-known by most conservation researchers may facilitate implementation. Conservation professionals working outside academic institutions should have more access to research so that conservation is better supported by current science. In this perspective, I present elements missing from current discussions of open access and suggest potential pathways for journal publishers and researchers to make conservation publications more open. There are many promising avenues for open access to play a larger role in conservation research, including archiving pre-prints and post-prints, more permissive “green” open access policies, and increasing access to older articles. Collectively supporting open access practices will benefit our profession and the species we are working to protect.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/7rt3u
Subjects
Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
academic publishing, conservation biology, conservation science, Open Access, Peer Review, research-implementation gap, scientific societies, wildlife management
Dates
Published: 2019-05-02 05:58
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.