Experimentally testing the response of feral cats and their prey to poison baiting

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1071/WR21008. This is version 3 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Michelle Hall, Ben Parkhurst, Vanessa Westcott

Abstract

Feral cats Felis catus have caused the decline and extinction of many species worldwide, particularly on islands and in Australia where native species are generally naïve to the threat of this introduced predator. Effectively reducing cat populations to protect wildlife is challenging because cats have a cryptic nature, high reproductive rate and strong reinvasion ability. We experimentally tested the response of feral cats and their native prey to an Eradicat® poison baiting program at a conservation reserve. Baits were distributed by hand along roads and tracks every 50 m (~10 baits km-2). We used camera traps to monitor the response of cats to baiting using a repeated before-after, control-impact design over six years. We also measured introduced rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus activity using sand pads and small mammal and reptile captures using pitfall trapping. Dynamic occupancy modelling revealed only modest effects of baiting on cats in two out of six years, with occupancy in the baited area decreasing from 54% to 19% in 2014 (-35%) and 89% to 63% in 2017 (-26%). Baiting effectiveness was not related to antecedent rainfall or prey availability. Bait availability was reduced by non-target interference; 73% of 41 baits were removed by non-target species. We found no evidence for persistent changes in small mammal or reptile capture rates in the baited area relative to the unbaited area over the life of the project. Relatively low baiting density and non-target interference with baits are likely to have reduced baiting efficacy. Further testing and refinement of ground baiting is needed, including trialling higher baiting densities and/or frequencies. We highlight key areas for future research that should benefit feral cat management not only in Australia, but also on the many islands worldwide where cats threaten native wildlife.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/nygu7

Subjects

Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences

Keywords

cat baiting, dynamic occupancy model, Impact evaluation, invasive predator, lethal control, pest control

Dates

Published: 2020-12-04 06:33

Last Updated: 2021-04-19 09:23

Older Versions
License

CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International