What state of the world are we in? Targeted monitoring to detect transitions in vegetation restoration projects.

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2728. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

This Preprint has no visible version.

Download Preprint
Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Christopher Jones, Freya Thomas, Damian Michael, Hannah Fraser, Elliot Gould, Jen Wilson, Peter Anton Vesk, Libby Rumpff

Abstract

Monitoring vegetation restoration is challenging because ‘best practice’ monitoring is costly, requires long-term funding, and involves monitoring multiple vegetation variables which are often not linked back to learning about progress toward objectives. There is a clear need for the development of targeted monitoring programs that focus on a reduced set of variables that are tied to specific restoration objectives. In this paper, we present a method to progress the development of a targeted monitoring program, using a pre-existing state-and-transition model. We i) use field data to validate an expert-derived classification of woodland condition states; ii) use this data to identify which variable(s) help differentiate woodland condition states; and iii) identify the target threshold (for the variable) that signifies the desired transition has been achieved. The measured vegetation variables from each site in this study were good predictors of the different states of vegetation condition. We show that by measuring only a few of these variables, it is possible to assign the vegetation condition state for a collection of sites, and monitor if and when a transition to another state has occurred. Out of nine vegetation variables considered, the density of immature trees and percentage of exotic understorey vegetation cover were the variables most frequently specified as effective to define a threshold or transition. We synthesise findings by presenting a decision tree that provides practical guidance for the development of targeted monitoring strategies for woodland vegetation.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/mt3xy

Subjects

Biodiversity, Life Sciences

Keywords

monitoring, restoration, state-and-transition model, thresholds, woodlands

Dates

Published: 2021-08-29 16:09

License

CC-BY Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International