The evolution of conspicuousness in frogs: when to signal toxicity?

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14092. This is version 3 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Sophie M. Roberts, Devi Stuart-Fox, Iliana Medina

Abstract

Many organisms use conspicuous color patterns to advertise their toxicity or unpalatability, a strategy known as aposematism. Despite the recognized benefits of this anti-predator tactic, not all chemically defended species exhibit warning coloration. Here, we use a comparative approach to investigate which factors predict the evolution of conspicuousness in frogs, a group in which conspicuous coloration and toxicity have evolved multiple times. We extracted color information from dorsal and ventral photos of 594 frog species for which chemical defense information was available. Our results show that chemically defended and diurnal species have higher internal chromatic contrast, both ventrally and dorsally, than chemically undefended and/or nocturnal species. Among species that are chemically defended, conspicuous coloration is more likely to occur if species are diurnal. Contrary to previous studies, our results suggest that the evolution of conspicuous color is more likely to occur in chemically defended prey with smaller body size. We discuss potential explanations for this association and suggest that prey profitability (related to body size) could be an important force driving the macroevolution of warning signals.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/xnu3j

Subjects

Behavior and Ethology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution, Life Sciences

Keywords

Dates

Published: 2022-04-06 08:28

Last Updated: 2022-04-08 12:22

Older Versions
License

CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International