This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.977836. This is version 4 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
For graduate students, securing prestigious fellowships provides incredible benefits such as increased job opportunities and likelihood of receiving awards. These benefits can be particularly life-changing for a graduate student who may come from a marginalized background. However, the inequity in fellowship distribution hinders the success of graduate students, especially those who are marginalized. The majority of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) is white and attend top-ranked institutions. Within the GRFP, there is a clear disconnect between the grantee’s proposed broader impacts and follow-through. To value and support communities, and graduate students of color in the process, the GRFP must be reimagined. In this article, we provide a brief background on the relationship between STEM and marginalized communities, and how broader impacts currently function as a band-aid to the issues of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion in STEM. We then conclude by providing recommendations to improve the broader impacts section and the awardee selection process.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/kc7bx
Subjects
Life Sciences
Keywords
broader impacts, DEI, Justice, marginalized communities, NSF GRFP
Dates
Published: 2022-06-24 16:33
Last Updated: 2022-09-15 10:10
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.