Repeatability of performance within and across contexts measuring behavioral flexibility

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Kelsey McCune, Aaron Blaisdell, Zoe Johnson-Ulrich, Dieter Lukas, Maggie MacPherson, Benjamin M Seitz, August Sevchik, Corina J Logan

Abstract

Research into animal cognitive abilities is increasing quickly and often uses methods where behavioral performance on a task is assumed to represent variation in the underlying cognitive trait. However, because these methods rely on behavioral responses as a proxy for cognitive ability, it is important to validate that the task structure does, in fact, target the cognitive trait of interest rather than non-target cognitive, personality, or motivational traits (construct validity). One way to validate that task structure elicits performance based on the target cognitive trait is to assess the temporal and contextual repeatability of performance. In other words, individual performance is likely to represent an inherent trait when it is consistent across time and across similar or different tasks that theoretically test the same trait. Here, we assessed the temporal and contextual repeatability of the cognitive trait behavioral flexibility in great-tailed grackles. For temporal repeatability, we quantified the number of trials to form a color preference after each of multiple color reversals on a serial reversal learning task. For contextual repeatability, we then compared performance on this task to the latency to switch solutions on two different multi-access boxes. We found that the number of trials to form a preference in reversal learning was repeatable across serial reversals and the latency to switch a preference was repeatable across reversal learning and the multi-access box contexts. This supports the idea that reversal learning and solution switching on multi-access boxes similarly reflect the inherent trait of behavioral flexibility.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/kevqp

Subjects

Animal Experimentation and Research, Behavior and Ethology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Research Methods in Life Sciences

Keywords

Dates

Published: 2022-08-10 19:14

License

CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.