Skip to main content
Predicting future wolf density in Scandinavia under land-use and climate scenarios with an individual-based hybrid model

Predicting future wolf density in Scandinavia under land-use and climate scenarios with an individual-based hybrid model

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

Sinchan Ghosh , Oskar Franklin, Barbara Zimmermann

Abstract

Managing wolves in Scandinavia requires projections of the density and distribution of territories under future land-use and climatic change. We coupled machine-learning estimators of deer availability, habitat suitability and the spatial pattern of human-caused mortality with a deterministic pack-level model of recruitment, dispersal, territory formation and territory size on a 50 × 50 km grid, and simulated Scandinavian wolf (Canis lupus) territories from 1999 to 2060 under five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). We tested whether territorial wolf density increases (H1a), decreases (H1b) or remains unchanged (H1c), and whether its distribution becomes more homogeneous (H2a), more heterogeneous (H2b) or remains unchanged (H2c). Without parameters fitted to the coupled trajectory, the model reproduced the colonisation of 1999–2015 (territories, R² = 0.90) and, out of sample, the plateau of 2016–2024 (84 simulated against 76 observed territories in 2024). Territories peaked at about 90 around 2040 and declined to 81–84 by 2060 under all pathways, while mean territory size fell from 807 to 596–666 km² and the density-weighted centroid moved from 59.9 to 57.6–58.0 °N. Territorial density increased under every pathway (H1a; SSP5-8.5: +16% in the last epoch relative to 1999–2015, Holm-adjusted p < 0.001). Its spatial heterogeneity was 16–19% higher than in the baseline but showed no significant trend under SSP5-8.5 (H2c) and increased significantly only under SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6 (H2b). Regime-shift analysis identified three to four shifts, the last between 2027 and 2035, followed by a regime that persisted to 2060. Territory counts differed by 3% among pathways and density by 12%, and both the density increase and the southward shift depended on the spatial pattern of human-caused mortality. Wolf dynamics to 2060 are therefore governed by human-caused mortality and inbreeding rather than by climate.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2RX14

Subjects

Life Sciences, Population Biology, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology

Keywords

Canis lupus; agent-based model; territory dynamics; Crowley–Martin functional response; human-caused mortality; inbreeding; SSP scenarios; regime shifts; Scandinavia

Dates

Published: 2026-11-14 14:14

Last Updated: 2026-11-14 14:14

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
https://github.com/gsinchanpostdoc/Wolf-model

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 6

Downloads: 0