Skip to main content
A common benchmark for Aedes albopictus phenological models reveals surveillance data, not model complexity, as the limiting factor

A common benchmark for Aedes albopictus phenological models reveals surveillance data, not model complexity, as the limiting factor

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Daniele Da Re , Margo Blaha, Dominic Brass, Cyril Caminade, Miguel Garrido, Pachka Hammami, Giovanni Marini, Mina Petric, Andrea Radici, Roberto Rosà, William Wint, Kamil Erguler

Abstract

Forecasting the seasonal dynamics of Aedes albopictus, a highly invasive arbovirus vector now established across much
of Europe, is a growing public health priority. Numerous mechanistic and correlative models have been developed over
the last two decades, but largely in isolation, each calibrated and validated against its own data, which has prevented any
assessment of where predictive capacity is genuinely limited. Rather than ranking models, which were built for different
purposes and cannot be reduced to a single skill score, we establish common ground: a shared evaluation framework in which
six mechanistic models, one correlative machine learning model, and two naive baseline predictors are driven by identical
ERA5-Land forcing and assessed against the harmonised VectAbundance ovitrap dataset (Albania, Italy, Switzerland) using
a single protocol, with robustness quantified by bootstrap resampling. We additionally combine the models into a weighted
ensemble via approximate Bayesian computation. Both naive baselines outperformed every process-based and machine
learning model, and the ensemble matched but did not exceed the best individual models. Predictive skill varied markedly
in space, with all model classes, including the uncalibrated baselines, performing best in intensively monitored regions and
worst at sparsely sampled sites. This pattern suggests that geographic variation in skill reflects the density and consistency of
surveillance data more than differences in model complexity. We present this benchmark not as a league table but as shared
infrastructure, common evaluation data, covariates, and protocol, on which comparable, policy-relevant forecasting tools can
be built, and we argue that sustained, harmonised surveillance is the principal precondition for operational Ae. albopictus
prediction.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2CH6G

Subjects

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Entomology, Life Sciences

Keywords

Dates

Published: 2026-10-20 08:22

Last Updated: 2026-10-20 08:22

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 30

Downloads: 1