Skip to main content
Building from biodiversity assessment to place-based conservation action across scales of information and governance.

Building from biodiversity assessment to place-based conservation action across scales of information and governance.

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Carlos Carroll , Asena Goren, Thomas Hoctor, Reed Noss, Lindsay Dreiss, Daniel Rohlf

Abstract

Scientific assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services are challenged by the need to examine systemic drivers of change while maintaining support in a polarized political climate. Recent US national policy shifts that reduce federal support for scientific assessments underscore the necessity of a broad-based, resilient, and scalable assessment framework with sustained engagement of conservation practitioners from academia, non-governmental organizations, and subnational governments. Such an information ecosystem would integrate spatial data relevant to practitioners from national to regional extents with case studies of place-based strategies and mechanisms for framing local successes within national objectives. Subnational initiatives such as the Florida Wildlife Corridor and Southeast Conservation Adaptation Strategy provide examples of ambitious, science-informed conservation assessments developed and implemented with both governmental and public support. Engaging a diversity of participants and ensuring greater salience across scales are complementary approaches to strengthening the effectiveness of assessments. Sustaining non-governmental capacity for engagement with the assessment process requires improved models of collaboration, altered academic reward structures, and diverse sources of funding. Improved integration of national-scale data in subnational assessments can strengthen existing models, including state and provincial biodiversity strategies, and support the synthesis of currently fragmented spatial data on biodiversity distribution, threats, and conservation priorities. Stronger linkages between narrative assessments and spatial data, between spatial data and place-based action, and between public engagement with the assessment process and local conservation initiatives can ensure a diverse, resilient support system for biodiversity data development, synthesis, and application that produces actionable knowledge to support place-based conservation.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2R70V

Subjects

Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Keywords

biodiversity monitoring, Convention on Biological Diversity, ecosystem services, Global Biodiversity Framework, National Nature Assessment

Dates

Published: 2026-09-28 11:13

Last Updated: 2026-09-28 11:13

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None.

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable.

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 8

Downloads: 0