Skip to main content
Beyond caveat emptor: reducing nitrous oxide risk in the soil carbon offset market

Beyond caveat emptor: reducing nitrous oxide risk in the soil carbon offset market

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Emily Stuchiner , Joseph C. von Fischer

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) storage projects are an increasingly prominent natural climate solution, drawing investment from diverse climate-sensitive stakeholders. However, the OC additions that build SOC can alter emissions of the potent greenhouse gas (GHG) nitrous oxide (N2O). These emission changes can erode the intended GHG benefit when OC inputs fuel spatiotemporally episodic hot spots and hot moments (HSHM), which can dominate annual N2O emission budgets. Concerningly, HSHM are systematically under-quantified by the emission factors and process-based models that most SOC protocols rely on. This creates a poorly quantified risk to the demonstrable net climate benefit of SOC projects. To address this, we make two novel contributions. First, we introduce an assessment framework that scores the probability of project-induced N2O increases across distinct domains that are typically conflated in existing frameworks. One domain of the score characterizes N2O risk based on site and SOC intervention practices while the other evaluates the adequacy of N2O emission measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification (MMRV) under the protocol being applied. Second, we propose that credit retirement be linked to the composite N2O risk score so that N2O emissions are explicitly factored into SOC accounting protocols. We close with a research-to-practice agenda that proposes two parallel sets of objectives. The first is protocol performance trials, wherein crediting workflows are run under intensive direct field measurements to empirically characterize N2O accounting accuracy in current protocols. The second is development of direct measurements that comprise “minimum viable MMRV” for robust N2O accounting in SOC projects right now. Our proposed activities will help prevent the establishment of crediting systems that retire GHG credits that are not representative of true CO2-equivalent offsets. Rigorous accounting of N2O in SOC projects must become a shared responsibility of the research community, project developers, buyers, and registries.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2F694

Subjects

Life Sciences

Keywords

Nitrous oxide, N2O, Soil organic carbon (SOC) Soil carbon crediting Greenhouse gas accounting Measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification (MMRV) Carbon markets Natural climate solutions Hot spots and hot moments, Soil organic carbon, SOC, Greenhouse gas, Carbon project, Carbon accounting, Nature-based climate solution, NbCS, Measurement monitoring reporting and verification, MMRV, Hot spots and hot moments

Dates

Published: 2026-09-09 14:59

License

CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 23

Downloads: 2