Skip to main content
Ecological Patterns in Mammalian Vocal Frequencies: Evidence Across Body Sizes and Habitats

Ecological Patterns in Mammalian Vocal Frequencies: Evidence Across Body Sizes and Habitats

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Jiya Shah, Tamanna Rathore, Anuradha Batabyal

Abstract

Vocalisations in mammals are an important sensory modality that is used for various purposes in communication, courtship, territorial display, navigation, prey detection, predator avoidance, reproduction, and social coordination. These various call functions are differentiated from each other through certain properties. Call spectral properties are influenced by anatomical constraints, especially body size, and habitat characteristics. Such a bioacoustics phenomenon has been studied in only specific mammalian taxa without large-scale cross-species comparison. Our study aims to bridge that gap by comparing vocalisation frequencies in a representative sample of mammals across ecosystems. To understand the patterns of mammalian vocal frequencies across body sizes and habitats, we relied on two hypotheses. Allometric scaling hypothesis, suggesting that sound frequencies are influenced by body size due to constraints on the geometry of the vocal tract, lung pressure, and the frequency of the vocal fold vibrations. The acoustic adaptation hypothesis suggests that the nature of the habitat impacts vocal frequencies, and sound structure reflects the properties of the habitat. Additionally, the study also compares these variations across call functions and microhabitats. The results, in accordance with the hypotheses, demonstrate an inverse relationship between body size and vocal frequency. Smaller mammals (e.g., bats, rodents) produce higher-frequency sounds due to shorter vocal tracts and smaller resonating chambers. On the other hand, large mammals (e.g., elephants, whales) produce lower-frequency, long-wavelength calls that propagate farther. Subsequently, habitat modulates frequency differently depending on call functions. Aquatic mating calls are found to be higher-pitched, possibly due to clearer transmission in water, and aquatic social calls are lower in frequency compared to terrestrial mammalian call frequencies, consistent with low-frequency communication for group cohesion underwater. This study provides a large-scale comparison of representative mammalian species across body sizes and habitats to test the prevalent ecological hypothesis of acoustic adaptation and allometric scaling.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2JH5N

Subjects

Life Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

Mammals, Vocalisation frequency, Acoustic Adaptation, Call Spectrum, Ecological Habitats, Biomechanics

Dates

Published: 2026-08-11 06:33

Last Updated: 2026-08-11 06:33

License

No Creative Commons license

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 37

Downloads: 2