Skip to main content
Best analytical practices for estimating consumer reliance on basal food sources using bulk stable isotopes

Best analytical practices for estimating consumer reliance on basal food sources using bulk stable isotopes

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

Mattia Ghilardi , Renato A. Morais, Simon J. Brandl, Jordan M. Casey, Alexandre Mercière, Fabien Morat, Nina M. D. Schiettekatte, Mohsen Kayal, Yves Letourneur, Valeriano Parravicini

Abstract

1. Bulk stable isotopes have been utilised by ecologists for decades to trace the assimilation of basal food sources across trophic positions. However, there is a lack of guidance on the post-laboratory analytical workflow, leading to inconsistencies in how isotopic data are processed and interpreted.

2. We provide a comprehensive description of this necessary post-laboratory analytical workflow, including the mathematical rationale underlying the estimation of consumer reliance on basal sources. Using simulated data, we test the sensitivity of estimated basal source proportions to the number of isotopic baselines used for the estimation of consumer trophic position and to varying sample sizes of sources and consumers. Finally, we apply the workflow to a coral reef food web to quantify fish reliance on benthic and pelagic primary production.

3. Our results indicate that estimated basal source proportions are highly sensitive to bias in the estimation of consumer trophic position, suggesting that trophic position estimation requires careful consideration of the number and nature of selected isotopic baselines. We provide an R function to quantify this bias. By contrast, the precision and uncertainty—but not the accuracy—of these proportions are influenced by the sample sizes of consumers and sources. Thus, small sample sizes can still yield valid estimations and can be included. The case study further highlights the sensitivity of estimated proportions to the selection of trophic discrimination factors (TDFs), and we suggest performing a sensitivity analysis with alternative TDFs.

4. While compound-specific stable isotope analysis is gaining prominence, bulk stable isotope analysis remains a cornerstone for field ecologists due to its high throughput, cost-effectiveness and availability of data collected over the last 20 years. By providing a detailed analytical framework and identifying future directions for model development, we offer a robust analytical foundation for future isotopic studies.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2BM2P

Subjects

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences

Keywords

mixing models, trophic position, trophic discrimination factors, food web analysis, methodological framework, resource assimilation, isotope ecology

Dates

Published: 2026-06-30 03:52

Last Updated: 2026-06-30 03:52

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Code to reproduce results and figures is available on GitHub for both the simulations (https://github.com/mattiaghilardi/SIMMmultitroph_simulations) and the case study (https://github.com/mattiaghilardi/SIMMmultitroph_case_study), along with the Mo'orea stable isotope dataset.

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 10

Downloads: 1