Skip to main content
Blitz the Gap: a nation-wide effort to guide citizen science toward the needs of biodiversity science

Blitz the Gap: a nation-wide effort to guide citizen science toward the needs of biodiversity science

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

Katherine Hébert , Nathan G. Earley, John D. Reynolds, Diane Srivastava, Brian M. Starzomski, Michelle Tseng, Guillaume Larocque, James Pagé, Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne, Peter Soroye, Sandra Emry, David AGA Hunt, Pierre Rogy, Christophe Brabant, Stephen Deedes-Vincke, M. Camila Diaz-Corzo, Lukas Eckert, Kristyn Eckhardt, Sue Elwell, Nicole J. Kester, Joshua Sean Lee , Shirley Morrison, Eniola Olu-Ayorinde, Lindsay L. Trottier, Lukas van Riel, Sarfaroz Yunusov, Isaac Eckert, Janaína de Andrade Serrano, Noah Wightman, Maho Horikawa, Ryan Hull, Leeya Nagpal, André-Philipp Drapeau Picard, Étienne Lacroix-Carignan, Derek Duplessis, Étienne Léveillé-Bourret, Marc-Antoine Poulin, Anthony B. Zerafa, Laura J. Pollock

Abstract

To resolve persistent biases in conservation assessments and forecasting, we urgently need more systematic collection of biodiversity data. Citizen (or, community) science, despite its reputation for unstructured data, offers a particularly promising path forward, mobilizing participation at scales and speeds unmatched by traditional monitoring. Here, we introduce Blitz the Gap, a pan-Canadian initiative to guide citizen science with sampling ‘challenges’, bioblitzes and paid initiatives using iNaturalist. One year of semi-guided sampling helped to gain 540 species newly recorded on iNaturalist Canada, almost 50,000 km2 of added spatial coverage, better representation of northern climates, and new evidence to help identify Key Biodiversity Areas. These results demonstrate the potential for guided citizen science, especially for taxonomic discovery, range-filling, and early alerts for species on the move. Our experience highlights the need for more tailored guidance and gamification, further development of adaptive sampling methods, and funding for bioblitzes and training of future taxonomists and naturalists. As countries work towards global conservation targets for 2030 and 2050, citizen science should be one of the core pillars of any large-scale monitoring network, contributing unparalleled taxonomic depth and engagement.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2T09G

Subjects

Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Keywords

Citizen science, community science, Canada, adaptive sampling, biodiversity, bias, iNaturalist, species distribution model, biodiversity monitoring

Dates

Published: 2026-06-17 06:28

Last Updated: 2026-06-18 10:05

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None.

Data and Code Availability Statement:
The iNaturalist Canada dataset was downloaded on December 1, 2025 and provided by the Canadian Wildlife Federation. These data are available from the iNaturalist API or upon request for large batch (>300k observations) downloads. Code to reproduce analyses and figures is available at: github.com/PollockLab/BTG-analyse-the-gap.

Language:
English