Large organisations are critical to halting and reversing biodiversity loss, and increasingly making bold commitments for nature. However, translating commitments into action requires robust strategies to fully identify, quantify, trace, and act. This is particularly pertinent because most organisational impacts are hidden within complex supply chains. Here we present a novel, generalised, and scalable approach to assessing and addressing supply chain impacts on biodiversity, demonstrating its applicability using a large organisation (Oxford University). We show how organisations can evaluate supply chain traceability and transparency, estimate region-specific biodiversity impacts, and harness collaborations for impact mitigation. Among Oxford's 131 highest-spend suppliers, only 18 disclosed raw material origins, with two offering product life-cycle assessments, evidencing the major traceability gap resulting in a systemic accountability barrier. We home in on a single product (coffee) to demonstrate how organisations could move beyond diagnosis to action: Applying life cycle impact assessment to estimate Oxford's coffee procurement biodiversity footprint and demonstrate translation of these insights into practical, collaborative interventions with in-country partners. By shifting the focus beyond diagnosing supply chains as a major driver of biodiversity loss to delivering actionable solutions, this study provides a scalable pathway for large organisations to contribute to global nature recovery.

">
Skip to main content
Towards Nature Positive supply chains: From biodiversity commitments to organisational action

Towards Nature Positive supply chains: From biodiversity commitments to organisational action

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Éilish Farrelly , Talitha Bromwich, Sophus O.S.E zu Ermgassen, Joseph W Bull, Hollie Booth, Heather Needham, Alice Karuri, Samuel Thuo Mungai, Kamau Mbarire, Thomas B White, Emily Stott, Charlotte Maddinson, E.J. Milner-Gulland

Abstract

Large organisations are critical to halting and reversing biodiversity loss, and increasingly making bold commitments for nature. However, translating commitments into action requires robust strategies to fully identify, quantify, trace, and act. This is particularly pertinent because most organisational impacts are hidden within complex supply chains. Here we present a novel, generalised, and scalable approach to assessing and addressing supply chain impacts on biodiversity, demonstrating its applicability using a large organisation (Oxford University). We show how organisations can evaluate supply chain traceability and transparency, estimate region-specific biodiversity impacts, and harness collaborations for impact mitigation. Among Oxford's 131 highest-spend suppliers, only 18 disclosed raw material origins, with two offering product life-cycle assessments, evidencing the major traceability gap resulting in a systemic accountability barrier. We home in on a single product (coffee) to demonstrate how organisations could move beyond diagnosis to action: Applying life cycle impact assessment to estimate Oxford's coffee procurement biodiversity footprint and demonstrate translation of these insights into practical, collaborative interventions with in-country partners. By shifting the focus beyond diagnosing supply chains as a major driver of biodiversity loss to delivering actionable solutions, this study provides a scalable pathway for large organisations to contribute to global nature recovery.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X27H5V

Subjects

Agriculture, Biodiversity, Climate, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Policy, Environmental Sciences, Natural Resources and Conservation, Natural Resources Management and Policy, Sustainability, Water Resource Management

Keywords

Supply Chains, value chains, biodiversity footprint, life-cycle assessment, life-cycle impact assessment, upstream, sustainability, business, organisational impacts, climate change, Nature Positive, Biodiversity loss

Dates

Published: 2026-05-22 01:49

Last Updated: 2026-06-02 09:59

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The writing of this manuscript was supported by a University of Oxford "Small Grant" as part of the Oxford Sustainability Fund. TB, TW and JB receive income from consultancy services related to biodiversity footprinting, impact assessment and strategy design for organisations.

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable

Language:
English