Skip to main content
Colossal Disinformation

Colossal Disinformation

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Vincent Lynch

Abstract

I have a position: de-extinction is almost impossible, however, deëxtinction, a word invented by the world’s first “de-extinction” company Colossal Laboratories & Bioscience’s can be (Max 2025); hereafter Colossal, which they define as the creation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that appear and act like extinct species, is possible. It’s branding, not science. I and other critics of Colossal have been subjects of a “dark public relations” campaign to discredit us (Wolinsky et al. 2025). Here I briefly explore how deëxtinction distorts basic genetic principles, species concepts, and ultimately undermines public trust in science. My critique is not of synthetic biology or GMOs. In this essay “I settle the matter once and for all, by showing which elements of each side are correct” (Clarke 2012). Only one side is correct, and it’s not the one advertising deëxtinction.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2HX0K

Subjects

Biology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences

Keywords

de-extinction, deëxtinction, Colossal Laboratories & Bioscience, Colossal

Dates

Published: 2026-05-20 00:07

Last Updated: 2026-05-20 00:07

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable

Language:
English