Skip to main content
Missing the mammals for the trees: comparative biogeography of southern Appalachian sky island biodiversity

Missing the mammals for the trees: comparative biogeography of southern Appalachian sky island biodiversity

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Kimberly July Cook, David Webster, Juliet Stowe, Trinity Johnson, AJ Hopkins, Lisa Gatens, James K Krupa, Rada Petric, Joseph R. Burger

Abstract

Sky islands are patches of relic ecosystems on mountaintops, often forest types, that were previously connected in the geological past and are now patchily distributed. Whether a particular sky island forest serves as an umbrella for conserving sky island fauna with a similar patchy distribution is an open question. To address this, we systematically delineate sky islands and identify spruce-fir-birch forest patches–southernmost boreal relicts of the Pleistocene–in relation to sky island mammal distributions in the southern Appalachians. Leveraging digitized museum records and vegetation maps, we compare the distribution of sky island mammals to one another as well as to the distribution of spruce-fir forest patches. We identify 10 southern Appalachian mammals associated with high elevations andour results show that 5 of the 10 small mammal focal species do co-occur with large spruce-fir-birch (SFB) forest patches across sky islands. These “spruce-fir associates” all occur on one or more sky islands lacking extensive SFB forests. Furthermore, pairwise comparisons across all 10 focal species revealed significant co-occurrence of SFB and non-SFB associates. Together, these results suggest that the presence of SFB forest is not a sufficient “umbrella” for even spruce-fir associate mammals. Conservation efforts focused exclusively on high-elevation forest types of the southern Appalachian and elsewhere may, indeed, miss the mammals for the trees.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2RH3R

Subjects

Life Sciences

Keywords

Appalachians, fragmented habitat, mountains, museum specimens, spruce-fir

Dates

Published: 2026-03-21 06:46

Last Updated: 2026-03-21 06:46

License

CC-BY Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Language:
English