Skip to main content
Do harbour porpoise mortality records reflect living population structure? A matrix population model diagnostic

Do harbour porpoise mortality records reflect living population structure? A matrix population model diagnostic

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Michaela Kirstine Hjelm Hansen, Magnus Wahlberg, Owen Russell Jones 

Abstract

Effective conservation of marine mammals depends on reliable demographic information, yet acquiring such data for highly mobile cetaceans is challenging. Harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) are widely used as sentinel species, but much of what is known about their demography comes from stranding and bycatch records. While invaluable, these data may be filtered by drift, detection, reporting effort, and age-specific vulnerability.


We developed a matrix population model (MPM)-based diagnostic framework to quantify how observed stage compositions in mortality datasets deviate from asymptotic demographic expectations. Using a stage-structured MPM parameterised from published vital rates, we derived the stable stage distribution (SSD) and compared it with age-class distributions from 10,863 harbour porpoise strandings (of 16,181 total records) in Danish and North Sea waters, bycatch and mixed-mortality records, and hunting captures from Greenland and Denmark. Deviations from SSD, and from the composition expected among deaths, were assessed using goodness-of-fit tests, distance metrics, and tests of the juvenile proportion.


Strandings showed strong and consistent departures from SSD expectations, with juveniles markedly over-represented across spatial and temporal scales. Juveniles remained over-represented relative to the composition expected among deaths under baseline rates, and the departure from the living population was robust to variation in vital rates. Divergence from the asymptotic stage structure was moderate to strong, varied across space, and increased significantly over time in 3 of 6 regions. Bycatch, mixed-mortality, and hunting captures showed comparable SSD divergence, indicating that juvenile-heavy mortality composition is not an artefact of stranding sampling alone.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2WM18

Subjects

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Population Biology

Keywords

selective mortality, demographic filtering, sampling bias, demographic inference, stage-structured modelling, population projection models, wildlife monitoring

Dates

Published: 2026-03-04 09:19

Last Updated: 2026-10-21 07:03

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
All analytical code, input data, and derived outputs required to reproduce the analyses are archived on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18664348).

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 422

Downloads: 161