This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Do harbour porpoise mortality records reflect living population structure? A matrix population model diagnostic
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Effective conservation of marine mammals depends on reliable demographic information, yet acquiring such data for highly mobile cetaceans is challenging. Harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) are widely used as sentinel species, but much of what is known about their demography comes from stranding and bycatch records. While invaluable, these data may be filtered by drift, detection, reporting effort, and age-specific vulnerability.
We developed a matrix population model (MPM)-based diagnostic framework to quantify how observed stage compositions in mortality datasets deviate from asymptotic demographic expectations. Using a stage-structured MPM parameterised from published vital rates, we derived the stable stage distribution (SSD) and compared it with age-class distributions from 10,863 harbour porpoise strandings (of 16,181 total records) in Danish and North Sea waters, bycatch and mixed-mortality records, and hunting captures from Greenland and Denmark. Deviations from SSD, and from the composition expected among deaths, were assessed using goodness-of-fit tests, distance metrics, and tests of the juvenile proportion.
Strandings showed strong and consistent departures from SSD expectations, with juveniles markedly over-represented across spatial and temporal scales. Juveniles remained over-represented relative to the composition expected among deaths under baseline rates, and the departure from the living population was robust to variation in vital rates. Divergence from the asymptotic stage structure was moderate to strong, varied across space, and increased significantly over time in 3 of 6 regions. Bycatch, mixed-mortality, and hunting captures showed comparable SSD divergence, indicating that juvenile-heavy mortality composition is not an artefact of stranding sampling alone.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2WM18
Subjects
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Population Biology
Keywords
selective mortality, demographic filtering, sampling bias, demographic inference, stage-structured modelling, population projection models, wildlife monitoring
Dates
Published: 2026-03-04 09:19
Last Updated: 2026-10-21 07:03
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
All analytical code, input data, and derived outputs required to reproduce the analyses are archived on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18664348).
Language:
English
Metrics
Views: 422
Downloads: 161
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.