Skip to main content
Wild boar population control needs more than recreational hunting

Wild boar population control needs more than recreational hunting

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Christian Gortázar, David Relimpio, Nicolás Urbani, Jorge R. López-Olvera

Abstract

This perspective addresses the challenges of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population control in two different scenarios: reactive management to control disease epidemics and proactive management of wild boar populations at larger geographic scales. Intense but silent wild boar culling can significantly contribute to local outbreak control. Larger wild boar free buffer zones might work in front-like disease expansion settings or to protect pig farming hotspots. However, long-term proactive management based only on hunting, predation and diseases cannot compensate the population growth favoured by increasing forest surface and irrigated crops and disappearing competition by livestock. Addressing these drivers would imply profound agricultural and environmental policy changes which often are beyond the reach of wildlife managers and animal health authorities.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2SM0Z

Subjects

Animal Sciences, Biodiversity

Keywords

Wild boar, Population control, disease management

Dates

Published: 2026-01-09 05:21

Last Updated: 2026-01-09 05:21

License

No Creative Commons license

Additional Metadata

Language:
English

Conflict of interest statement:
This perspective is intended for publication in the European Journal of Wildlife Research, where CG is the Editor-in-Chief, JLO is an Associate Editor, and DR is a Guest Editor of the thematic collection “Management of Wild Boar and Other Suids” of the journal EJWR.