Skip to main content
The Queer & Trans Field Safety Assessment: a tool for protecting minoritized field scientists

The Queer & Trans Field Safety Assessment: a tool for protecting minoritized field scientists

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

Amelia Hope Reynolds, Evan Ho, Ronnie Steinitz, Mar C Arroyo, Mel Baldino, Kobie Boslough, Rachel Carlson, Sara Herrejon Chavez, Melanie Esparza, Julian E Fearon, Amiel Flores, Paige V Kouba, Nina A Sokolov, Allison Payne

Abstract

Ecological fieldwork poses heightened risks for LGBTQIA+ scientists due to inadequate safety protocols and identity-based vulnerabilities. Best practices to improve safety for queer field researchers exist, yet over 50% of LGBTQIA+ field scientists report feeling unsupported, with structural and cultural barriers unaddressed. Our team of 15 researchers from the University of California developed the Queer and Trans Field Safety Assessment: an example-based tool designed to support inclusive field environments. Drawing from best practices in field safety literature, the assessment offers a structured checklist that addresses safety needs before, during, and after fieldwork across four key categories: climate, protocols, training, and accessibility. This paper outlines the assessment’s development and intended applications for field teams, field courses, field stations, and research labs. By offering a concrete tool, we hope to bridge the gap between recommendations and implementation in field safety and promote the inclusion and well-being of queer and trans field researchers.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2W360

Subjects

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences

Keywords

LGBTQIA+, fieldwork, Ecology, safety, queer, trans

Dates

Published: 2025-11-12 02:44

Last Updated: 2025-11-12 02:44

License

No Creative Commons license

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
All data and code used in this study are publicly available and archived in Zenodo (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17531742) and are publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/rsteinitz/qtifs). This complies with ESA’s Open Research Policy.

Language:
English