This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
The Invisible Majority: Disciplinary Bias and the Systematic Neglect of Real Biodiversity
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Taxonomy underpins all biodiversity sciences, yet its essential role in measuring and managing life on Earth remains underrecognized in conservation and policy frameworks. Analyzing 360 articles from 12 leading ecology and taxonomy journals in 2024, we reveal that ecologists overwhelmingly focus on historically familiar vertebrates, while taxonomists emphasize recently described invertebrates—the overlooked majority of real biodiversity. These contrasting “Species Scapes” illustrate how disciplinary perspectives systematically shape what counts as biodiversity, with direct consequences for conservation and policy frameworks that depend on accurate taxonomic data. Integrating taxonomic expertise into biodiversity governance is essential for comprehensive policy implementation.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2CQ08
Subjects
Life Sciences
Keywords
Species Scape, Umwelt, taxonomy, ecology
Dates
Published: 2025-09-24 11:08
Last Updated: 2025-12-16 10:07
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Language:
English
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.