Skip to main content
Relational Thinking for Landscape Management and Conservation: can we really embrace a human/nature continuity?

Relational Thinking for Landscape Management and Conservation: can we really embrace a human/nature continuity?

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Élie Pédarros , Juan Fernandez-Manjarres

Abstract

It is increasingly recognized that the conservation of natural and degraded landscapes requires rethinking our relationships with nature by considering social-ecological complexity. Currently, managers are faced with a wealth of knowledge in landscape ecology, restoration ecology and related fields, that are all mobilized to solve management problems. However, many conceptual propositions fall inadvertently in the same human/nature divide that they try to surpass if based only on a systemic approach. In this article, we analyse the varying degrees to which restoration, reconciliation and reclamation ecologies have been influenced by relational thinking bringing together the cultural, social and ecological spheres. The greatest challenge remains to understand human-nature relationships as continuous, facilitating the integration of diversity of relationships, values and worldviews that require necessarily larger research and management teams, something not always possible to fund.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2C069

Subjects

Biodiversity, Environmental Studies

Keywords

Landscape management, restoration, Reconciliation ecology, Human-Wildlife Relationships

Dates

Published: 2025-09-01 20:15

Last Updated: 2025-09-01 20:15

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
Not applicable

Language:
English