This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
This Preprint has no visible version.
Download PreprintThis is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
This Preprint has no visible version.
Download PreprintThe current academic ‘ecosystem’ prioritizes publications and has remained in this stable state despite increasing calls for change. Although writing is a strong determinant of academic success, certain groups may experience publishing barriers that may be amplified by disruptive events like the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we surveyed 342 graduate students and postdoctoral scholars to assess (1) how identity predicted publishing outputs and (2) how the pandemic influenced feelings of writing productivity based on identity. We show that there were differential publication totals across identities. Respondents reported feeling less productive and motivated during the pandemic, despite having more time to write. BIPOC graduate students reported being the most negatively impacted. Since the pandemic disproportionately affected historically excluded groups, we urge the academic ‘ecosystem’ to transition away from an overemphasis on publication outputs and reach a new, more equitable stable state that evaluates accomplishments more holistically.
https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/cx4gf
Disability and Equity in Education, Education, Gender Equity in Education, Higher Education
graduate student, identity, Pandemic, postdoctoral scholar, publications
Published: 2022-08-31 05:40
CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Data will be available on Dryad upon publication.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.