Skip to main content
The spatial dynamics of nutrient limitation in communities of generalist predators of crop pests

The spatial dynamics of nutrient limitation in communities of generalist predators of crop pests

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Annabel Smyth, Raul Costa Pereira, Mia Croft, Jordan Patrick Cuff 

Abstract

Generalist arthropod predators vitally control crop pests, but their ability to perform this role relies on them obtaining sufficient nutrients within simplified crop environments. Field margins are thought to provide habitat and resources for predators, such as ground beetles, but how far into fields this provision extends is poorly understood. Since arthropod nutrient contents can vary significantly over small spatial scales, resource scarcity within arable monoculture field interiors may drive nutrient limitation, impacting the fitness of natural enemies of crop pests.

Integrating field surveys, colorimetric assays and laboratory feeding trials, we investigated how distance into crop fields and crop stage affect nutrient limitation of ground beetles within arable crop fields. We specifically compared the community structure, nutrient contents and nutritional preferences of beetles at different distances into crops, and between crops before and after harvest to determine likely impacts to nutrient limitation.

Ground beetle communities and nutrient contents varied with distance into the crop and crop stage, but variation in nutritional preferences in relation to distance into the crop was species-specific and dependent on crop stage. Nutritional feeding trials indicated broad lipid limitation across all samples in the study.

These findings indicate taxon-specific variation in the nutritional dynamics of ground beetle communities at different distances into fields, with some species potentially being better adapted to crop interiors and post-harvest landscapes. Increasing in-field proximity to semi-natural habitat through intercropping and similar management strategies could support nutritionally healthier populations of natural enemies with likely benefits to pest suppression.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32942/X2F11C

Subjects

Agriculture, Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Entomology, Life Sciences, Nutrition, Zoology

Keywords

arable, biocontrol, foraging ecology, macronutrients, optimal foraging theory, natural enemies, biocontrol, foraging ecology, macronutrients, optimal foraging theory, natural enemies

Dates

Published: 2026-10-30 09:24

Last Updated: 2026-10-30 09:24

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data and Code Availability Statement:
All data are openly available via Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23242041

Language:
English

Metrics

Views: 31

Downloads: 3